Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters



School districts will be required to verify they're fixing California's lowest-performing schools

Posted on January 10, 2019 at 2:15 PM

By the end of January, the state will publish the initial list of hundreds of low-performing California schools that must receive intensive help under the Every Student Succeeds Act, which Congress passed in late 2015.

On Wednesday, the State Board of Education approved how districts with any of those schools must verify what they’re doing to turn those schools around. A coalition of student advocacy groups unsuccessfully argued that documentation alone isn’t enough. They urged the state board to require more monitoring by county offices of education and proof that districts’ actions are improving student performance.

What is clear is that there will be a lot more schools in line for assistance than the board initially anticipated and that their numbers will stretch thin the $130 million per year in federal funding that’s been set aside for “comprehensive” assistance.

Like the No Child Left Behind Act, which it replaced, the Every Student Succeeds Act requires that states identify and improve the performance of the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools receiving federal funding for low-income students, along with high schools where fewer than two-thirds of students graduate. But unlike NCLB, which told states how to fix the schools — like firing the principal and replacing half the staff — Congress gave states wide latitude to choose their own strategies.

The state board’s plan for implementing the law, which took months of negotiating with U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’ staff, is consistent with the state’s new approach to accountability under local control.

The state plan says that the multicolored California School Dashboard will identify the low-performing schools, just as it does for districts. The dashboard uses a range of metrics, including suspension rates, chronic absenteeism and graduation rates — not just standardized test scores — to measure performance. And the plan says that school districts will be in charge of improving low-performing schools, consistent with how they address low-performing student groups districtwide that the dashboard identified.

With its vote on Wednesday, the board will require districts to add a separate section to their Local Control and Accountability Plans to deal with low-performing schools. LCAPs are the documents that districts must update yearly to spell out how they will spend money and expand programs and services for all students, particularly low-income children, English learners, foster and homeless youths.

In the new LCAP section, districts must verify that they thoroughly examined the school’s needs and weaknesses, adopted interventions that have been proven to work and identified “resource inequities” that a school improvement plan would address. A district must seek the advice of principals and other school leaders, teachers and parents and tell how the school will meet the needs of students at risk of not meeting the state academic standards.

Board members emphasized in the discussion that they were adopting an interim approach to satisfy federal law. Over the next three years, the California Department of Education plans to redo the LCAP to make it quicker to read and to write. Responding to repeated complaints that the public cannot track spending easily, if at all, in some districts, staff are creating a budget summary for parents. And the state’s Department of Finance will issue regulations this year requiring further budget transparency.

In a Jan. 4 letter, leaders of seven student advocacy nonprofits that formed the Equity Coalition credited the board’s efforts but criticized it for not taking a strong role in ensuring that low-performing schools actually make progress. They called for county offices of education, which already review district LCAPs to make sure they are complying with state law, to monitor the strategies and spending of districts.

“We want counties to play a more active role” and not simply “hold their noses if the plans are bad,” John Affeldt, managing attorney for Public Advocates, a coalition member, told the board on Wednesday.

State law requires that the state superintendent of public instruction and the state board intensify intervention if a district’s poorly performing student groups identified by the dashboard don’t improve within several years, but the state board hasn’t said what the interventions might be. The board similarly hasn’t decided what it might do with low-performing schools that don’t improve.

The state’s Department of Education is expected to name about 350 low-performing schools, based on those that perform in the red — the lowest of five color-coded performance levels — on all or most of the dashboard metrics. The wild card this year will be the addition of hundreds of district and county alternative high schools serving students who have dropped out, been expelled, spent time in juvenile hall or feel out-of-place in traditional high schools. They weren’t included under previous state accountability systems but will get long-overdue attention now. With low graduation rates, many, if not most, will likely make the state’s list.

Federal law requires that California distribute $130 million — 7 percent of its Title I funding for low-income schools — to fix the lowest-performing schools. A big list could reduce each school’s allocation, which could end up being anywhere between $200,000 and close to $400,000 per school.

The board is expected to further discuss the list and the state’s response to the Every Student Succeeds Act on Thursday with item 24 on the agenda (go here to view the slides for the presentation to the state board).


John Fensterwald

Categories: Curriculum and Assessment

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply Willieamome
1:07 PM on August 5, 2021 
next day shipping viagra i want to try viagra ViagraCND100Mg - best generic viagra review does viagra make you last longer in bed
Reply Robertvep
12:51 PM on August 5, 2021 herbal viagra samples
buy viagra germany bootleg viagra best price viagra
Reply PeterBup
12:43 PM on August 5, 2021 
generic for viagra canada viagra $38 jtiovvc - cheap viagra australia online viagra online
discount viagra ViagraCND100Mg viagra for women in australia CialisCND20Mg branded viagra without prescription
Reply Willieamome
10:16 AM on August 5, 2021 
viagra coupons online viagra recipe - viagra plus australia viagra
Reply PeterBup
9:08 AM on August 5, 2021 
what to say to get viagra what is the active ingredient in viagra gciidkh - viagra paypal canada payment generic viagras names
does viagra make you bigger or just hard viagra in sacramento ca viagra levitra trial pack
Reply kobe shoes
8:45 AM on August 5, 2021 
I would like to show some appreciation to you for bailing me out of this type of instance. After scouting through the the net and meeting tips which are not helpful, I believed my entire life was done. Being alive without the answers to the difficulties you have sorted out by way of your good report is a critical case, as well as those which might have badly affected my career if I had not encountered the blog. The ability and kindness in maneuvering all the things was valuable. I'm not sure what I would've done if I hadn't discovered such a solution like this. I can now relish my future. Thank you so much for your skilled and effective guide. I won't think twice to refer your site to anyone who ought to have guidance on this subject matter.
kobe shoes
Reply Willieamome
7:27 AM on August 5, 2021 
photos of real viagra buy viagra ireland online - statins and viagra free viagra trials
Reply Robertvep
6:50 AM on August 5, 2021 online viagra reviews
viagra onlin viagra cheap prices xjuhebr to buy viagra super force in london
Reply PeterBup
5:23 AM on August 5, 2021 
cialis vs viagra vs kamagra buy viagra australia online no prescription cuqoqry - best viagra prices forum tried viagra no prescription
viagra brand 100mg viagra brand online sensitivity walgreen viagra
Reply Willieamome
4:40 AM on August 5, 2021 
viagra online canada 300 mg viagra - how much does viagra cost in canada cialis vs viagra reddit
Reply Alanjeaky
4:15 AM on August 5, 2021 
viagra pro
Reply Robertvep
4:14 AM on August 5, 2021 viagra sub
viagra with depoxatine overnight shipping ViagraCND100Mg viagra no prescription cialis viagra with dapoxetine
Reply Judyjeaky
3:17 AM on August 5, 2021 
pfizer celebrex
Reply Pauljeaky
2:06 AM on August 5, 2021 
where can i get sildenafil without prescription
Reply Willieamome
1:49 AM on August 5, 2021 
viagra substitute worldwide buy strong viagra ViagraCND100Mg - viagra cialis combo natural viagra alternatives medical
Reply PeterBup
1:35 AM on August 5, 2021 
viagra in toronto can i buy viagra over the counter in the us - buy indian viagra viagra 2 day delivery
viagra espanol cvwnxjz viagra pfizer buy online canada CialisCND20Mg what doctor prescribes viagra
Reply Robertvep
1:26 AM on August 5, 2021 viagra for sale on line
viagra .com buy cheap generic viagra online CialisCND20Mg viagracoupons
Reply Willieamome
11:19 PM on August 4, 2021 
why dose viagra cost so fucking much viagra for no prisiption ViagraCND100Mg - use viagra cheap viagra canada
Reply PeterBup
11:05 PM on August 4, 2021 
female viagra uk viagra no prescription next day delivery - viagra cheap cheapest viagra exchange
lowcost viagra viagra dapoxetine reliable dnnxsmk cialis vs viagra
Reply Robertvep
10:16 PM on August 4, 2021 viagra dubai online
where can buy viagra genaric viagra online buy viagra online overnight