Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters

Blog

Blog

Send special ed funding directly to districts, not regional agencies, report says

Posted on November 29, 2016 at 3:25 PM
Wouldn't that be something if Brown actually followed through with this recommendation.  This will be interesting to watch as it unfolds.

----------------------------------------------------

The state should dismantle its system for distributing special education funding for California’s 718,000 students with disabilities and send the money – billions of dollars – directly to local school districts, according to a much anticipated report that’s expected to draw the attention of Gov. Jerry Brown and state education leaders.

 

The recommendations, made by researchers at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California and released Tuesday, would upend the way special education finance has worked in the state for nearly 40 years and potentially put out of business 133 regional special education agencies known as Special Education Local Plan Areas, or SELPAs.

 

State money for special education would be folded into the Local Control Funding Formula, completing Brown’s goal of creating a unified funding system for all children. Funding earmarked for students with disabilities would continue to be spent for general special education, but districts would have “no firm restrictions on use,” the report recommended. Districts would have more flexibility to respond to individual needs earlier, before formally designating students as having disabilities.

 

“We recognize some may find this option threatening,” said the PPIC report’s authors, led by Laura Hill and Paul Warren. “Nevertheless, we view it as a critical step towards a more integrated system of special and general education.”

 

If Brown and the Legislature were to adopt the recommendations, school districts would face new challenges to ensure students are properly identified as needing services, provide the necessary services, and report data on the demographics of students in special education to state and federal governments.

 

State Board of Education President Michael Kirst called the recommendations “bold and provocative.” He is to participate in a panel discussion on the proposal at noon Tuesday at PPIC’s Sacramento office.

 

Special education has long been an island in education. Because of financing complexities and federal and state special education mandates, Brown left special education out of the Local Control Funding Formula law in 2013. The $12 billion special education budget in California in 2014-15 – a mix of district, state and federal funds – inadequately served students, according to the final report of the Statewide Task Force on Special Education this past year.

 

The rights of students with special needs and their families are dictated by complex federal laws. And the academic performance of students – the majority of whom are not intellectually impaired but must overcome speech and language disorders or learning disabilities – lags their peers. The Statewide Task Force on Special Education issued a call for training teachers to co-teach with special education teachers to meet the needs of many students in one classroom.

 

The task force cited the same major financing problems that the PPIC report identified.

 

Inequitable funding: SELPAs are funded based on outdated 20-year-old formulas. There are wide disparities, with the top fifth of SELPAs getting 40 percent more funding per student than the bottom fifth.

 

Inadequate funding: In order to discourage overidentifying students with disabilities, SELPAs are funded based on districts’ overall student enrollment, not the percentage of special education students – a formula PPIC wouldn’t change. However, Brown has put more money into the Local Control Funding Formula and kept special education funding flat over the past decade, PPIC said. And funding has not responded to the increase in students with severe disabilities, such as autism.

 

PPIC estimated that raising per-student funding to the level of better-funded SELPAs and addressing higher costs generated by rising caseloads would cost between $670 million and $1.1 billion annually.

 

Poor accountability: “California does not hold SELPAs accountable for student success in any formal way,” PPIC wrote. The state doesn’t set performance goals for special education, and SELPAs aren’t required to track student performance, the report said. Each SELPA has its own formula for distributing state and federal funding. “We were unable to find budget and administrative plans on the internet for more than half of the state’s multidistrict SELPAs,” the report said.

 

Districts would be held more accountable by incorporating special education into school districts’ three-year spending documents, known as Local Control and Accountability Plans, the report said. Districts would be asked to set goals and chart the progress of students receiving special education services. Parents would be better able to share their perspectives, the report said.

 

The task force did not recommend the demise of SELPAs. In a paper last month, the task force’s co-executive directors, Vicki Barber, former director of the El Dorado County SELPA, and Maureen O’Leary Burness, former director of four different Northern California SELPAs, suggested that fixing the current system would be the preferable option.

 

“Troubling issues would have to be addressed to avoid unintended consequences” of moving toward direct district funding, Barber said in an interview Monday. She said SELPAs negotiate contracts for services, spread the costs of serving students with very expensive needs, and provide expertise and administrative services. Most of the state’s districts have fewer than 2,500 students and would struggle to provide these functions on their own, she said.

 

PPIC said the possible roles of SELPAs, without directly funding them in the future, would need to be redefined and clarified. Under the new approach, districts presumably could choose to keep funding reconstituted SELPAs for some functions, create new multidistrict agreements or contract services with providers of their choice.

 

Kirst had encouraged PPIC to do the study, which was funded by the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation and the Stuart Foundation.

 

Cid Van Koersel, program director for WarmLine Family Resource Center in Sacramento, a federally funded parent training and information center for special education, said parents don’t know much about how special education is financed.

 

“Ninety percent of the time, families have never heard the word ‘SELPA,’” Van Koersel said. But she said they do know the services they want and need, and she wondered what would happen if the SELPA funding system disappeared. The local planning areas fund programs through county offices of education, she said, including programs for students who live in districts that are too small to provide services.

 

“What about the SELPA-run preschool for children with autism?” Van Koersel asked. “Who is going to provide that program?”


Categories: Supporting Educational Support Systems

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

1686 Comments

Reply Lisajeaky
12:40 AM on September 18, 2021 
furosemide 4
Reply Hietlycet
11:35 PM on September 17, 2021 
Reply Wimjeaky
3:39 PM on September 17, 2021 
canada cialis over the counter viagra online cheap no prescription
Reply Judyjeaky
2:27 PM on September 17, 2021 
viagra usa
Reply Priligy
10:36 AM on September 17, 2021 
precio caja cialis
Reply Alanjeaky
10:28 AM on September 17, 2021 
cialis for sale mexico
Reply Ashjeaky
10:16 AM on September 17, 2021 
finasteride atenolol 100mg cost levitra soft tabs cialis daily india azithromycin 250 mg where to buy
Reply Amyjeaky
9:24 AM on September 17, 2021 
ivermectin 3mg for lice
Reply Kiajeaky
1:33 AM on September 17, 2021 
sildenafil 100mg price usa
Reply Ashjeaky
1:13 AM on September 17, 2021 
online pharmacy denmark cheap price sildenafil 100 mg buy sildenafil citrate 100mg cheap viagra canada free shipping cheap allbuterol stromectol cost tadalafil 30 mg
Reply Carljeaky
11:05 PM on September 16, 2021 
tadalafil price uk
Reply Ugojeaky
7:33 PM on September 16, 2021 
cheapest cialis prices how much is cialis 10mg
Reply Amyjeaky
6:48 PM on September 16, 2021 
sildenafil paypal
Reply Eyejeaky
6:28 PM on September 16, 2021 
buy viagra online without rx
Reply Jasonjeaky
4:11 PM on September 16, 2021 
metformin 50 mg
Reply Scouscunc
2:54 PM on September 16, 2021 
Zithromax
Reply Wimjeaky
2:53 PM on September 16, 2021 
can i buy ventolin online mexico buy cialis on line without prescription buy discount cialis online viagra generic otc
Reply Eyejeaky
3:16 AM on September 16, 2021 
lisinopril 10 mg online
Reply Boojeaky
2:48 AM on September 16, 2021 
viagra pill where to buy viagra generic 50mg generic sildenafil usa price generic sildenafil
Reply Lisajeaky
11:57 PM on September 15, 2021 
ivermectin drug
0