Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters

Blog

Blog

Send special ed funding directly to districts, not regional agencies, report says

Posted on November 29, 2016 at 3:25 PM
Wouldn't that be something if Brown actually followed through with this recommendation.  This will be interesting to watch as it unfolds.

----------------------------------------------------

The state should dismantle its system for distributing special education funding for California’s 718,000 students with disabilities and send the money – billions of dollars – directly to local school districts, according to a much anticipated report that’s expected to draw the attention of Gov. Jerry Brown and state education leaders.

 

The recommendations, made by researchers at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California and released Tuesday, would upend the way special education finance has worked in the state for nearly 40 years and potentially put out of business 133 regional special education agencies known as Special Education Local Plan Areas, or SELPAs.

 

State money for special education would be folded into the Local Control Funding Formula, completing Brown’s goal of creating a unified funding system for all children. Funding earmarked for students with disabilities would continue to be spent for general special education, but districts would have “no firm restrictions on use,” the report recommended. Districts would have more flexibility to respond to individual needs earlier, before formally designating students as having disabilities.

 

“We recognize some may find this option threatening,” said the PPIC report’s authors, led by Laura Hill and Paul Warren. “Nevertheless, we view it as a critical step towards a more integrated system of special and general education.”

 

If Brown and the Legislature were to adopt the recommendations, school districts would face new challenges to ensure students are properly identified as needing services, provide the necessary services, and report data on the demographics of students in special education to state and federal governments.

 

State Board of Education President Michael Kirst called the recommendations “bold and provocative.” He is to participate in a panel discussion on the proposal at noon Tuesday at PPIC’s Sacramento office.

 

Special education has long been an island in education. Because of financing complexities and federal and state special education mandates, Brown left special education out of the Local Control Funding Formula law in 2013. The $12 billion special education budget in California in 2014-15 – a mix of district, state and federal funds – inadequately served students, according to the final report of the Statewide Task Force on Special Education this past year.

 

The rights of students with special needs and their families are dictated by complex federal laws. And the academic performance of students – the majority of whom are not intellectually impaired but must overcome speech and language disorders or learning disabilities – lags their peers. The Statewide Task Force on Special Education issued a call for training teachers to co-teach with special education teachers to meet the needs of many students in one classroom.

 

The task force cited the same major financing problems that the PPIC report identified.

 

Inequitable funding: SELPAs are funded based on outdated 20-year-old formulas. There are wide disparities, with the top fifth of SELPAs getting 40 percent more funding per student than the bottom fifth.

 

Inadequate funding: In order to discourage overidentifying students with disabilities, SELPAs are funded based on districts’ overall student enrollment, not the percentage of special education students – a formula PPIC wouldn’t change. However, Brown has put more money into the Local Control Funding Formula and kept special education funding flat over the past decade, PPIC said. And funding has not responded to the increase in students with severe disabilities, such as autism.

 

PPIC estimated that raising per-student funding to the level of better-funded SELPAs and addressing higher costs generated by rising caseloads would cost between $670 million and $1.1 billion annually.

 

Poor accountability: “California does not hold SELPAs accountable for student success in any formal way,” PPIC wrote. The state doesn’t set performance goals for special education, and SELPAs aren’t required to track student performance, the report said. Each SELPA has its own formula for distributing state and federal funding. “We were unable to find budget and administrative plans on the internet for more than half of the state’s multidistrict SELPAs,” the report said.

 

Districts would be held more accountable by incorporating special education into school districts’ three-year spending documents, known as Local Control and Accountability Plans, the report said. Districts would be asked to set goals and chart the progress of students receiving special education services. Parents would be better able to share their perspectives, the report said.

 

The task force did not recommend the demise of SELPAs. In a paper last month, the task force’s co-executive directors, Vicki Barber, former director of the El Dorado County SELPA, and Maureen O’Leary Burness, former director of four different Northern California SELPAs, suggested that fixing the current system would be the preferable option.

 

“Troubling issues would have to be addressed to avoid unintended consequences” of moving toward direct district funding, Barber said in an interview Monday. She said SELPAs negotiate contracts for services, spread the costs of serving students with very expensive needs, and provide expertise and administrative services. Most of the state’s districts have fewer than 2,500 students and would struggle to provide these functions on their own, she said.

 

PPIC said the possible roles of SELPAs, without directly funding them in the future, would need to be redefined and clarified. Under the new approach, districts presumably could choose to keep funding reconstituted SELPAs for some functions, create new multidistrict agreements or contract services with providers of their choice.

 

Kirst had encouraged PPIC to do the study, which was funded by the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation and the Stuart Foundation.

 

Cid Van Koersel, program director for WarmLine Family Resource Center in Sacramento, a federally funded parent training and information center for special education, said parents don’t know much about how special education is financed.

 

“Ninety percent of the time, families have never heard the word ‘SELPA,’” Van Koersel said. But she said they do know the services they want and need, and she wondered what would happen if the SELPA funding system disappeared. The local planning areas fund programs through county offices of education, she said, including programs for students who live in districts that are too small to provide services.

 

“What about the SELPA-run preschool for children with autism?” Van Koersel asked. “Who is going to provide that program?”


Categories: Supporting Educational Support Systems

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

1686 Comments

Reply antiochfc
6:06 AM on October 23, 2021 
puma ultra 1.1 mg curry city edition for cheap jordan 1 tokyo 2020 nike air max 97 og silver bullet navy blue cincinnati reds hat zero nike free 5 0 2014 men hvid
antiochfc http://www.antiochfc.com/
Reply bikeasea
6:10 PM on October 21, 2021 
jersey chelsea 2004 for cheap pluto pandora nike roshe run hyp prm qs or trophy new balance fresh foam x 1080 v10 new york yankees pinstripe hat vietsub michael kors zip wallet
bikeasea http://www.bikeasea.com/
Reply Prednisone
11:15 PM on October 10, 2021 
Cialis Contrareembolso Alicante
Reply Reittekep
3:54 AM on October 9, 2021 
https://prednisonebuyon.com/ - buy prednisone online no script
Reply Sethype
10:28 PM on October 7, 2021 
Neurontine
Reply Neurontine
3:30 PM on October 5, 2021 
Norvasc 2.5mg Online In Canada
Reply attelty
7:04 PM on October 3, 2021 
http://buyneurontine.com/ - gabapentin side effects
Reply Soitrarty
10:59 AM on October 2, 2021 
prednisone side effects in women
Reply azithromycin side effects
6:06 PM on September 25, 2021 
cialis pills online
Reply Plaquenil
4:09 PM on September 24, 2021 
Tretinoin 20 20 Gm From India
Reply Naiptof
1:16 AM on September 24, 2021 
https://buypriligyhop.com/ - can you buy priligy in the u.s.
Reply plaunny
11:58 AM on September 23, 2021 
http://buyzithromaxinf.com/ - buy zithromax z pak
Reply heldobece
6:23 PM on September 22, 2021 
Plaquenil
Reply Buhiminue
10:04 AM on September 22, 2021 
Reply tankpaima
7:38 AM on September 22, 2021 
Lasix
Reply Lasix
8:50 PM on September 19, 2021 
Priligy En Generico
Reply steextDat
1:43 PM on September 18, 2021 
Priligy
Reply Pauljeaky
8:27 AM on September 18, 2021 
how to buy modafinil
Reply Maryjeaky
8:19 AM on September 18, 2021 
order viagra paypal
Reply Boojeaky
7:47 AM on September 18, 2021 
buy ivermectin canada can you purchase viagra in mexico
0