Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters

Blog

Blog

Coalition fighting cap on budget reserves stumbles

Posted on September 21, 2015 at 5:00 AM

An update on the reserve cap and the pending legislation to repeal it.  I think we can all agree that the movement was much stronger when we were united.  

---------------------------

EdSource,Sep 17, 2015 | By John Fensterwald

Coalition fighting cap on budget reserves stumbles

A push in the Legislature to reduce the restrictions on school districts’ budget reserves faltered last week after a coalition of school organizations fractured over proposed compromises.

 

Senate Bill 799 remained stuck in an Assembly committee on Friday, the last day of the session. It will resurface next year, and negotiations will continue, said Dennis Meyers, assistant executive director for the California School Boards Association.

 

At issue was a disagreement over how far the school organizations should compromise on their bill, which sought a total repeal of the cap on district reserves that legislative leaders and Gov. Jerry Brown imposed, at the urging of the California Teachers Association, as part of the 2014 state budget.

 

The cap would force districts to spend down money they put aside for economic uncertainties, emergencies and other purposes, like future computer purchases, whenever the state put money into a new rainy day fund for K-12 and community colleges. Although deposits into that fund are predicted to be infrequent – and probably won’t be made in the next several years – the California School Boards Association and other school management groups, including the Association of California School Administrators, complained that the cap potentially threatens districts’ financial stability and their credit ratings, and contradicts the state commitment to local control.

 

“We too loved SB 799, but one of the first rules is don’t fall in love with your bill,” said Dennis Meyers, California School Boards Association.

Last month, the school boards association-led coalition, which included some children’s advocacy groups, the League of Women Voters and the California State PTA, proposed an alternative to a repeal: SB 799 would exempt from the cap districts with less than 2,501 students, whose finances can be the most volatile, along with property tax-rich districts, called basic aid districts, which rely solely on local property taxes to pay their bills. For other districts, the cap on reserves would be raised to 17 percent, nearly triple the average 6 percent that the Legislature imposed. The new limit would be in line with the minimum reserve that a national oversight organization recommended.

 

Along with the prime authors, Senate Democrats Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, and freshman Steve Glazer, D-Orinda, 15 Republican and Democratic legislators signed on as co-authors. But, sensing the bill was still in trouble, CSBA resumed negotiations on its own with the California School Employees Association, the union that represents hourly school employees, such as custodians and teachers aides. Those discussions led to a new proposal that would have set the maximum cap for most districts at 12 percent, midway between the current limit and SB 799’s 17 percent, and removed the exemption for many basic aid districts. It also would have required school boards to give a monthly accounting of money in reserves that districts assigned for specific purposes that didn’t count toward the cap under SB 799.

 

Those proposed changes didn’t go over well with members of the coalition, who were presented with them two days before the final day of the session. The California Associations of School Business Officers, with 3,000 members, wrote SB 799’s sponsors saying the proposed changes “are a step in the wrong direction and would erode the fiscal safety net to schools.” The California State PTA issued an alert to all legislators saying it would not support further amendments or an alternative to SB 799. The Association of California School Administrators didn’t officially oppose the proposal because it hadn’t seen the actual wording, but Executive Director Wes Smith said he also made it clear to legislators that his organization couldn’t support changes to the bill that it hadn’t reviewed and approved.

 

Molly McGee Hewitt, executive director of the school business officers organization, said she opposed all three “ill-conceived” changes. She expressed concern that the proposed concessions would make it harder to hold the line on passing SB 799 intact.

 

But Meyers said everyone acknowledges that repeal of the reserves cap “is not really in the cards,” so the goal is to significantly weaken the law. “We too loved SB 799 (as originally written),” he said, “but one of the first rules is don’t fall in love with your bill. Everyone needs to be open to any changes so that a bill that can get signed.”


Categories: Reserve Cap

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

1266 Comments

Reply MichaelTieRb
11:30 AM on November 30, 2022 
paxil 10 mg tablet
Reply MichaelTieRb
9:52 PM on November 28, 2022 
how much is plavix generic
Reply Pauljeaky
1:06 AM on November 25, 2022 
buy valtrex online without prescription
Reply Rodneycom
3:55 AM on November 14, 2022 
pharmacy
Reply Azathioprine st
4:20 PM on November 3, 2022 
where can i buy divalproex divalproex 125mg otcdivalproex price divalproex online pharmacy
Reply AndrewMate
11:45 PM on November 1, 2022 
Privatlana i Sverige
Reply OdinFaib
11:41 PM on October 30, 2022 
Reply Anastrozole st
11:03 PM on October 30, 2022 
digoxinmg without a doctor prescription digoxin 0.25 mg online pharmacyhow to purchase digoxin digoxin united kingdom
Reply Flomax st
10:50 PM on October 28, 2022 
prilosec price prilosec 20 mg over the counter prilosec 40 mg usa
Reply SullivanZoof
10:48 AM on October 28, 2022 
lane 100 000 kroner
Reply Zofran st
12:03 AM on October 27, 2022 
donepezil pharmacy donepezil 10mg pharmacydonepezil online pharmacy donepezil pharmacy
Reply Miguelkic
8:39 AM on October 26, 2022 
Fitnessstudio Wadersloh-Liesborn
Reply Coumadin st
5:17 PM on October 24, 2022 
biaxin purchase how to purchase biaxin biaxin for sale
Reply MalikOi
6:21 AM on October 24, 2022 
Lainaa 7000 euroa
Reply RussellOi
12:53 AM on October 22, 2022 
Reply Sildenafil st
1:48 PM on October 21, 2022 
flomax 0,2 mg no prescription flomax 0,4 mg generic flomax australia
Reply Buspar st
8:53 PM on October 18, 2022 
thorazine cost thorazine 100mg cost thorazine 50mg cheap
Reply ParkerOi
8:30 AM on October 18, 2022 
Prestito 20000 euro
Reply Lisajeaky
6:14 PM on October 16, 2022 
motilium 10mg tab
Reply Prochlorperazine st
10:48 AM on October 16, 2022 
warfarin for sale warfarin 1 mg ukwarfarin online pharmacy warfarin uk