Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters



Important Case Decision flies under the radar while we were focused on Vergara, -- could drastically impact school district employee evaluations- Author: Jackie McHaney

Posted on August 1, 2014 at 2:25 PM

With all of our attention recently focused on the outcome of the Vergara decision, the recent Court of Appeal decision in Poole v. Orange County Fire Authority (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 155, flew so low under the radar that it almost went unnoticed.


In Poole, Steve Poole was a firefighter with the Orange County Fire Authority (Fire Authority) from 2008 to 2010. As part of the evaluation process, Poole’s supervisor had a practice of maintaining daily logs on a flash drive and in a folder kept at his desk, to enable him to refresh his memory and assist him in preparing written evaluations. Poole’s supervisor asserted that the daily logs included the recording of “any factual occurrence or occurrences that would aid … in writing a thorough and fair annual review.” In the case at bar, it was determined that Poole’s supervisor made over one hundred handwritten and computerized notes, which documented the efficiency of Poole as well as other firefighters in the department, in carrying out their duties. In 2009, Poole’s supervisor, relying largely on his daily logs to aid in the preparation of the written evaluation, issued Poole a substandard evaluation because his “work habits, personal relations, adaptability, and progress were unsatisfactory.” As a result of this substandard evaluation, Poole was placed on a performance improvement plan.


Unsatisfied with his substandard evaluation, Poole (with the assistance of his union) sought copies of the daily logs, which included more than 100 entries regarding Poole, many of which described areas in need of improvement. Poole was provided copies of these documents. Upon receipt of these documents, Poole requested that all adverse comments in the daily logs be removed because he never had any opportunity to respond prior to their use for personnel purposes in his performance evaluation and subsequent improvement plan. The Fire Authority refused to remove the comments, contending that, even though the notes were for personnel purposes, they were never “entered” into any file used for personnel purposes. Rather, the Fire Authority contended that Poole had the opportunity to respond to the comments in the evaluation, which would be placed in the personnel file.


Poole lost at the trial court level. The trial court denied the petition, likening the daily logs to “post-it” notes that were intended to remind the supervisor of events when he prepared the annual performance evaluation. The trial court also pointed out that the parties conceded that if Poole’s supervisor had written Poole’s annual performance evaluation from his memory and not based on written recollections in the daily logs, there would have been no lawsuit. The trial court therefore concluded the daily logs were not part of the personnel file and Poole had no right to respond to the adverse comments. Poole and the union appealed the trial court decision.


On appeal, Poole and his union asked the court to order all adverse comments to be deleted from the daily logs pursuant to a provision of the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act (FBOR) that provides that adverse comments shall not be entered into a personnel file “or any other file used for any personnel purposes by his or her employer, without the firefighter having first read and signed the instrument containing the adverse comment indicating he or she is aware of the comment . . .” (Gov. Code, § 3255.) Obviously, the purpose of this request is to eliminate the ability of the Fire Authority to rely on these prior acts as a factual basis for the substandard performance evaluation and placement on the improvement plan.


In its review, the Court of Appeal relied heavily on an old California Supreme Court case, Miller v. Chico Unified School District, which interpreted an Education Code section regarding a teacher’s right to review and comment on information of a “derogatory nature” before placed in their personnel file. In Miller v. Chico Unified School District (1979) 24 Cal.3d 703, a school principal had been reassigned to a classroom position after the district’s governing board reviewed 20 (twenty) confidential memoranda prepared by an Associate Superintendent that the principal was unaware of. The California Supreme Court in Miller ultimately ordered the principal to be reinstated to his administrative position because the principal was not provided the opportunity to review or comment on the memoranda even though the district’s governing board made its decision based on these documents.


The Court held that the interpretation of the Education Code in the Miller decision should be applied to sections 3255 and 3256 of the FBOR. It noted that Poole’s supervisor’s daily logs were used for making personnel decisions and affected Poole’s employment status. Poole received a substandard annual performance evaluation and placed on an improvement plan, based upon the information maintained in the daily logs. (This of course discounts any independent recollection the supervisor may have had). The Court concluded that the FBOR was violated because the daily logs were used for personnel purposes. The Court noted that the FBOR’s right to respond to adverse comments that may affect personnel decisions “is frustrated when the firefighter’s supervisor maintains a daily log containing adverse comments that may reach as far back as the day after the firefighter’s last yearly evaluation and the adverse comments are not revealed to the firefighter until the next yearly review, at which point the firefighter may respond to adverse comments in that review.”


On February 26, 2014, the California Supreme Court granted a petition to review the recent Court of Appeal decision. It is important to understand, however, that if the Poole decision is upheld by the California Supreme Court, it will be problematic for school districts because many supervisors rely on informal notes compiled during an evaluation period to complete a thorough and accurate annual evaluation at the end of the year. Such a ruling will: (a) prohibit a supervisor from keeping or maintaining any negative notes or comments or documents regarding an employee unless the employee was provided a prompt opportunity to review and comment upon each separate note or comment; and (b) will require supervisors to start documenting every incident deemed worthy of consideration for inclusion in an evaluation, provide each employee with a separate comment or note and an opportunity to respond to it, and then place all of these documents into their personnel file – which we know employees will not respond well too.


Hopefully, the Supreme Court will conclude that an individual negative note or comment kept in an employee’s pending evaluation file and kept solely for the purposes of aiding in recollection to ensure accuracy in the preparation of the annual evaluation does not trigger a separate due process requirement. In the alternative, we could add “Photographic” or ‘Eidetic” memory to the list of qualifications required for supervisors, if our only alternatives are to prepare evaluations solely from memory or increase our file cabinet budget because of the size our personnel files will need to be now to accommodate the additional documentation the Poole decision may end up requiring be maintained in the personnel file, in addition to the evaluation document that essentially summarizes the same.


Welcome back to the new school year!


Categories: Lawsuits, Leadership

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply Tedjeaky
8:30 AM on August 19, 2022 
medication plavix 75mg
Reply LeroyPic
8:02 AM on August 19, 2022 
Amazing write ups. Thank you. best online canadian pharcharmy online pharmacies no prescription required pain medication walgreens online pharmacy
Reply Cheap Vibrating Sieve Stone Washer
7:45 AM on August 19, 2022 
Jacquard beach Towel Suppliers
Cheap Vibrating Sieve Stone Washer
Reply yeezy
7:41 AM on August 19, 2022 
My spouse and i ended up being now relieved when Jordan could carry out his preliminary research from the ideas he made when using the weblog. It is now and again perplexing to just choose to be giving freely secrets and techniques men and women could have been making money from. And now we do understand we need you to thank for this. These illustrations you've made, the simple web site menu, the friendships you will make it easier to promote - it's got mostly unbelievable, and it is making our son and the family know that this subject matter is awesome, and that's pretty vital. Thanks for all the pieces!
Reply Judyjeaky
5:11 AM on August 19, 2022 
plaquenil price singapore
Reply RudolphSkync
4:59 AM on August 19, 2022 
With thanks. Numerous information.
canada pharmacy reviews mexican pharmacy online medications buy drugs online
Reply 24 Inches Single Pole Bathroom Metal Towel Rack
3:44 AM on August 19, 2022 
Double Wall Corrugated Pipe Production Equipment
24 Inches Single Pole Bathroom Metal Towel Rack
Reply Annajeaky
2:46 AM on August 19, 2022 
how to get diflucan over the counter
Reply LowellTiept
2:13 AM on August 19, 2022 
Thanks, An abundance of data!
canadian overnight pharmacy canadian discount pharmacy
Reply LeroyPic
11:56 PM on August 18, 2022 
Nicely put. Many thanks. pharmacy northwest canada best online pharmacies without a script trust pharmacy
Reply Davisgag
10:16 PM on August 18, 2022 
albendazole over the counter usa
Reply Jackjeaky
9:12 PM on August 18, 2022 
online wellbutrin
Reply RudolphSkync
8:52 PM on August 18, 2022 
Thanks a lot. Terrific information! thecanadianpharmacy com medicin without prescription prescription drugs from canada online
Reply LowellTiept
6:11 PM on August 18, 2022 
You made the point. canadian drugs pharmacy apollo pharmacy online
Reply cheap stephen curry shoes
4:20 PM on August 18, 2022 
Thanks so much for giving everyone remarkably spectacular chance to read in detail from this web site. It is usually very lovely plus packed with amusement for me personally and my office colleagues to search your website at the least 3 times every week to see the new tips you will have. And of course, I'm just actually astounded considering the astonishing creative concepts served by you. Selected 1 ideas in this posting are unequivocally the most impressive I've had.
cheap stephen curry shoes
Reply curry shoes
4:20 PM on August 18, 2022 
I enjoy you because of your entire work on this web site. Gloria really likes working on investigation and it's simple to grasp why. A number of us learn all regarding the lively way you deliver great guidelines on your website and as well as strongly encourage response from some others about this article then our favorite child is without question understanding a whole lot. Take pleasure in the remaining portion of the year. You're conducting a pretty cool job.
curry shoes
Reply hermes handbags
4:20 PM on August 18, 2022 
I wanted to write down a small remark to appreciate you for the superb ways you are sharing at this site. My extended internet lookup has at the end been compensated with useful facts and strategies to talk about with my good friends. I would suppose that we site visitors actually are rather blessed to live in a good network with so many special professionals with interesting guidelines. I feel truly blessed to have seen your web page and look forward to many more amazing minutes reading here. Thanks again for all the details.
hermes handbags
Reply goyard outlet
4:20 PM on August 18, 2022 
I enjoy you because of all of the work on this website. Gloria take interest in conducting investigations and it's easy to see why. All of us hear all relating to the powerful tactic you create valuable tips and hints on your website and therefore welcome response from other individuals on that idea then our princess is becoming educated a lot. Have fun with the remaining portion of the year. You're the one performing a superb job.
goyard outlet
Reply yeezy shoes
4:19 PM on August 18, 2022 
I just wanted to post a comment in order to say thanks to you for those marvelous tactics you are showing here. My incredibly long internet investigation has now been recognized with pleasant points to go over with my contacts. I would declare that many of us website visitors are extremely lucky to exist in a decent site with very many special individuals with valuable suggestions. I feel very much happy to have discovered the webpages and look forward to really more entertaining moments reading here. Thank you again for all the details.
yeezy shoes
Reply supreme clothing
4:19 PM on August 18, 2022 
My spouse and i have been fortunate that Peter could round up his investigations using the precious recommendations he grabbed out of your web site. It's not at all simplistic just to find yourself giving freely ideas the others may have been making money from. We really consider we need the website owner to thank because of that. These explanations you've made, the easy web site menu, the relationships you will aid to promote - it's got everything spectacular, and it's really leading our son in addition to the family understand the article is exciting, and that's truly vital. Thank you for all!
supreme clothing