Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters

Blog

Blog

3 key budget moves favor teacher- not student- needs

Posted on July 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM

If you don't already have edsource.org bookmarked, be sure to add it to your professional development library.  They are always great at providing robust discussions and analysis of educational issues.  Here's a recent example that I just know many of you will appreciate! 

---------------------------------

3 key budget moves favor teacher – not student – needs

Credit: Courtesy of John Affeldt

With increased revenues in the state’s coffers, there are many things to like in the budget signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, but three key developments are setting off alarms for education advocates and community groups who supported the landmark Local Control Funding Formula reform. With each of them, the governor seems to be shaping or restricting the newfound flexibility in the funding formula in ways that principally benefit teachers’ interests and not the high-needs students supposedly at the heart of the reform.

First came the lightning bolt in the May revision of the budget, in which Brown proposed to address the state’s $74 billion unfunded liability in the California State Teachers Retirement System primarily on the backs of school districts. There is no question that the CalSTRS issue needs to be addressed and that failing to do so only makes matters more expensive down the road. But Brown’s solution is to increase the annual contributions from the state and teachers somewhat – and from districts a whole lot. The state’s responsibility and share of the burden vis-à-vis districts should be roughly reversed, with Sacramento instead carrying 70 percent of the load and districts only 20 percent. But rather than propose a plan to raise state revenues for the CalSTRS paydown, Brown wants districts to shoulder the bulk of that burden – with the existing inadequate level of school funding. This only worsens the consequences for kids. Districts use K-12 Proposition 98 funds to pay their CalSTRS share; the state’s contribution is from the General Fund. Thus, under the governor’s district-centric solution, there will be fewer Prop. 98 dollars statewide and fewer dollars from the Local Control Funding Formula on the ground for districts to use for programs and services for students.

Restricting districts’ reserves

Then at the 11th hour came another shocker. In conference committee, Brown inserted a statewide maximum on districts’ budget reserves, the size of which teacher and classified unions have long grumbled about. Now, when the state has a good year or two economically and puts money into its rainy day fund, districts will be forced to spend down their own local rainy day reserves. This might make sense if the state were guaranteeing its fund would fully cover district shortfalls should the economy go south or if the state guaranteed adequate annual funding for schools, but neither is the case. As such, it is folly to undercut local districts’ ability to plan prudently. For every good year that brings rainy day investments, subsequent economic downturns will surely follow. Hundreds of districts were negatively qualified by county offices of education during the recent downturn, and more than a few were close to insolvency. The ability to shore up reserves kept most districts afloat and served students well.

The Brown administration, with union support, slipped in this significant new restriction on local spending without any public hearings or debate or time for thoughtful consideration. With it in place, stores of local rainy day funds around the state will eventually be funneled straight onto the bargaining table in one chaotic swoop. Some funds will go toward temporary new programs and services (only to be eliminated via cuts and layoffs when school funding next takes a hit); other dollars will inevitably flow right into permanent salary increases. In many cases there will be too many new dollars coming too suddenly for districts to absorb into new programs and/or to withstand the bargaining pressure. The result will be better paid staff, but not necessarily new or better services for high-needs students as promised by the Local Control Funding Formula. Either way, when the bad times come, not having the local reserves to keep things afloat will lead to even more calamitous cuts and layoffs, ill serving the neediest students, who typically suffer the most when the cuts come.

For a governor who promised increased local decision-making under a new regime of “subsidiarity,” Brown just contradicted himself with two whoppers…

Limiting transparency

To punctuate the trifecta, near the close of budget negotiations the administration, with CTA’s urging, quietly removed a provision in the budget trailer bill to increase transparency around how supplemental and concentration dollars for high-needs students are spent by districts. The proposal to modify the state’s school accounting codes was advanced by civil rights advocates and community groups in an effort to increase the transparency for locals and policymakers on how this grand LCFF experiment is playing out for the students it is intended to serve. Both houses in the Legislature included language on transparency in their budget versions. The proposal would not have converted any LCFF funds into restricted dollars like the old categoricals nor reduced any flexibility in how LCFF dollars are spent. It merely would have shown, in broad categories, how supplemental and concentration dollars were being spent. Before the conference committee could even consider the proposal, the administration had it removed.

Mind you, the state has acknowledged, without concern, that many local districts are tracking these dollars with local accounting codes. Apparently, the objection is to the statewide aggregation of data and its potential effect on policy. As CTA told the conference committee in opposing the effort: “That aggregated analysis will misrepresent what is truly happening at local districts and will result in the same kind of statewide, data driven critique that the LCFF sought to reverse.”

So now that we value local control, we no longer can analyze aggregated data and respond appropriately? Could it be that the CTA and the governor don’t want it easily known that the bulk of supplemental and concentration dollars are flowing to higher benefit and salary costs (aided by the new CalSTRS fix and the local reserve cap) and not necessarily to new staff and higher services for high-needs students?

For a governor who promised increased local decision-making under a new regime of “subsidiarity,” Brown just contradicted himself with two whoppers: a new state mandate to spend limited funds on CalSTRS and a new prohibition on local fiscal planning. It’s true that most teachers deserve raises, just as most high-needs students deserve greater services to succeed with the new Common Core standards. But we trusted Brown that funding formula distributions would be decided locally, through the LCFF process – not precluded through CalSTRS mandates, funneled predominantly into salaries, and hidden from view.

It’s as if the administration has forgotten that LCFF was passed and carries legitimacy precisely because so many stakeholders came together – not just the unions, but also many districts and superintendents and civil rights and grassroots organizations representing parents, students and community advocates. These late-breaking, insider maneuvers risk undermining the consensus support for the new law. To restore that delicate consensus, a new conversation on how to adequately fund our schools (including the CalSTRS obligation) should begin; more immediately, the reserve cap should be removed and the transparency reporting provision reinserted. And going forward, these late-dropping, ground-shifting surprises have to be avoided.

•••

John Affeldt is Managing Attorney at Public Advocates Inc., a nonprofit law firm and advocacy organization. He has been recognized by California Lawyer Magazine as a California Attorney of the Year.

 

 

Categories: LCFF, California State Budget (2014-15)

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

4000 Comments

Reply sleekclassified
2:50 PM on September 26, 2022 
klingel bekleidung damen handyhülle s7 edge leder silikon handyhülle samsung galaxy s4 mini nike react 55 bleu antideslizante para zapatos maglia nuova liverpool
sleekclassified https://www.sleekclassified.com/
Reply jannamai
2:50 PM on September 26, 2022 
nike air max 90 weiß orange
jannamai https://www.jannamai.com/
Reply jimhfl
2:50 PM on September 26, 2022 
purple flower iphone 11 case fila stiefeletten yeezy zyon lace swap balenciaga schuhe neon grün zapatillas skechers go run mujer kangaroos kleid
jimhfl https://www.jimhfl.com/
Reply DavidAmibe
1:09 PM on September 26, 2022 
propecia mail order canada https://finasteridexl.com
Reply DavidAmibe
7:50 AM on September 26, 2022 
order propecia india https://finasteridexl.com
Reply DavidAmibe
2:32 AM on September 26, 2022 
buy propecia with prescription https://finasteridexl.com
Reply DavidAmibe
11:02 PM on September 25, 2022 
buy propecia tablets uk https://finasteridexl.com
Reply DavidTurgy
6:53 PM on September 25, 2022 
Hello there! stromectol liquid great internet site https://uustromectol.com
Reply JeffreyDrumn
3:17 PM on September 25, 2022 
cheap drugs online https://pharmacyonlinexp.online
Reply JeffreyDrumn
9:51 AM on September 25, 2022 
canadian pharmacy onli https://pharmacyonlinexp.online
Reply JeffreyDrumn
3:39 AM on September 25, 2022 
url=https://pharmacyonlinexp.online/ says...
canadian online pharmacies
https://pharmacyonlinexp.online
Reply Olivermes
8:45 PM on September 24, 2022 
Howdy!
url=https://pharmacyonlinexp.quest/ says...
pharmacy tech certification online
excellent web page https://pharmacyonlinexp.quest
Reply lajjafoundation
5:57 PM on September 24, 2022 
air jordan rosse nere e bianche pantaloncini dior black panther kobe jersey otterbox with screen protector iphone 12 louboutin sneaker damen nike chunky dunky slides
lajjafoundation https://www.lajjafoundation.com/
Reply gizmobhai
5:57 PM on September 24, 2022 
robe en lin blanche luxuar cocktailkleid blau hülle iphone 12 mini champion handyhülle basket chaussette michael kors femme alpargatas benavente
gizmobhai https://www.gizmobhai.com/
Reply songhonginconst
5:57 PM on September 24, 2022 
polo lacoste offerte old hornets jersey hard case samsung s10 scarpa mojito größentabelle nike zoom pegasus turbo 2 special edition nike damen schuhe deichmann
songhonginconst https://www.songhonginconst.com/
Reply websinfohk
5:57 PM on September 24, 2022 
langlaufschuhe damen salomon gorra verano robe noire superdry leo kleid c a schutzhülle ipad air 2020 akku hülle iphone 6s
websinfohk https://www.websinfohk.com/
Reply precisionairocala
5:57 PM on September 24, 2022 
parka fay uomo manchester united 2022 kit tablet covers argos winterstiefel damen gr 42 womens running shoe nike react miler nike air max herren schuhe
precisionairocala https://www.precisionairocala.com/
Reply tidyweekender
3:52 PM on September 24, 2022 
samsung book cover keyboard tab a 10.1 aj1 retro high blue converse 70s low top nike air max rot zapatos elsa frozen liverpool hippie kleider 2021
tidyweekender https://www.tidyweekender.com/
Reply executiveyp
3:52 PM on September 24, 2022 
iphone pro max 12 covers teva terra fi lite herren air max 90 gray and black air force 1 damen pixel zapatillas futbol neymar konfirmation kleidung mutter
executiveyp https://www.executiveyp.com/
Reply pastelpants
3:51 PM on September 24, 2022 
polo lacoste offerte old hornets jersey hard case samsung s10 scarpa mojito größentabelle nike zoom pegasus turbo 2 special edition nike damen schuhe deichmann
pastelpants https://www.pastelpants.com/