Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

California School Fiscal Services

Providing comprehensive business office and consulting services to K-12 traditional schools and charters



3 key budget moves favor teacher- not student- needs

Posted on July 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM

If you don't already have bookmarked, be sure to add it to your professional development library.  They are always great at providing robust discussions and analysis of educational issues.  Here's a recent example that I just know many of you will appreciate! 


3 key budget moves favor teacher – not student – needs

Credit: Courtesy of John Affeldt

With increased revenues in the state’s coffers, there are many things to like in the budget signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, but three key developments are setting off alarms for education advocates and community groups who supported the landmark Local Control Funding Formula reform. With each of them, the governor seems to be shaping or restricting the newfound flexibility in the funding formula in ways that principally benefit teachers’ interests and not the high-needs students supposedly at the heart of the reform.

First came the lightning bolt in the May revision of the budget, in which Brown proposed to address the state’s $74 billion unfunded liability in the California State Teachers Retirement System primarily on the backs of school districts. There is no question that the CalSTRS issue needs to be addressed and that failing to do so only makes matters more expensive down the road. But Brown’s solution is to increase the annual contributions from the state and teachers somewhat – and from districts a whole lot. The state’s responsibility and share of the burden vis-à-vis districts should be roughly reversed, with Sacramento instead carrying 70 percent of the load and districts only 20 percent. But rather than propose a plan to raise state revenues for the CalSTRS paydown, Brown wants districts to shoulder the bulk of that burden – with the existing inadequate level of school funding. This only worsens the consequences for kids. Districts use K-12 Proposition 98 funds to pay their CalSTRS share; the state’s contribution is from the General Fund. Thus, under the governor’s district-centric solution, there will be fewer Prop. 98 dollars statewide and fewer dollars from the Local Control Funding Formula on the ground for districts to use for programs and services for students.

Restricting districts’ reserves

Then at the 11th hour came another shocker. In conference committee, Brown inserted a statewide maximum on districts’ budget reserves, the size of which teacher and classified unions have long grumbled about. Now, when the state has a good year or two economically and puts money into its rainy day fund, districts will be forced to spend down their own local rainy day reserves. This might make sense if the state were guaranteeing its fund would fully cover district shortfalls should the economy go south or if the state guaranteed adequate annual funding for schools, but neither is the case. As such, it is folly to undercut local districts’ ability to plan prudently. For every good year that brings rainy day investments, subsequent economic downturns will surely follow. Hundreds of districts were negatively qualified by county offices of education during the recent downturn, and more than a few were close to insolvency. The ability to shore up reserves kept most districts afloat and served students well.

The Brown administration, with union support, slipped in this significant new restriction on local spending without any public hearings or debate or time for thoughtful consideration. With it in place, stores of local rainy day funds around the state will eventually be funneled straight onto the bargaining table in one chaotic swoop. Some funds will go toward temporary new programs and services (only to be eliminated via cuts and layoffs when school funding next takes a hit); other dollars will inevitably flow right into permanent salary increases. In many cases there will be too many new dollars coming too suddenly for districts to absorb into new programs and/or to withstand the bargaining pressure. The result will be better paid staff, but not necessarily new or better services for high-needs students as promised by the Local Control Funding Formula. Either way, when the bad times come, not having the local reserves to keep things afloat will lead to even more calamitous cuts and layoffs, ill serving the neediest students, who typically suffer the most when the cuts come.

For a governor who promised increased local decision-making under a new regime of “subsidiarity,” Brown just contradicted himself with two whoppers…

Limiting transparency

To punctuate the trifecta, near the close of budget negotiations the administration, with CTA’s urging, quietly removed a provision in the budget trailer bill to increase transparency around how supplemental and concentration dollars for high-needs students are spent by districts. The proposal to modify the state’s school accounting codes was advanced by civil rights advocates and community groups in an effort to increase the transparency for locals and policymakers on how this grand LCFF experiment is playing out for the students it is intended to serve. Both houses in the Legislature included language on transparency in their budget versions. The proposal would not have converted any LCFF funds into restricted dollars like the old categoricals nor reduced any flexibility in how LCFF dollars are spent. It merely would have shown, in broad categories, how supplemental and concentration dollars were being spent. Before the conference committee could even consider the proposal, the administration had it removed.

Mind you, the state has acknowledged, without concern, that many local districts are tracking these dollars with local accounting codes. Apparently, the objection is to the statewide aggregation of data and its potential effect on policy. As CTA told the conference committee in opposing the effort: “That aggregated analysis will misrepresent what is truly happening at local districts and will result in the same kind of statewide, data driven critique that the LCFF sought to reverse.”

So now that we value local control, we no longer can analyze aggregated data and respond appropriately? Could it be that the CTA and the governor don’t want it easily known that the bulk of supplemental and concentration dollars are flowing to higher benefit and salary costs (aided by the new CalSTRS fix and the local reserve cap) and not necessarily to new staff and higher services for high-needs students?

For a governor who promised increased local decision-making under a new regime of “subsidiarity,” Brown just contradicted himself with two whoppers: a new state mandate to spend limited funds on CalSTRS and a new prohibition on local fiscal planning. It’s true that most teachers deserve raises, just as most high-needs students deserve greater services to succeed with the new Common Core standards. But we trusted Brown that funding formula distributions would be decided locally, through the LCFF process – not precluded through CalSTRS mandates, funneled predominantly into salaries, and hidden from view.

It’s as if the administration has forgotten that LCFF was passed and carries legitimacy precisely because so many stakeholders came together – not just the unions, but also many districts and superintendents and civil rights and grassroots organizations representing parents, students and community advocates. These late-breaking, insider maneuvers risk undermining the consensus support for the new law. To restore that delicate consensus, a new conversation on how to adequately fund our schools (including the CalSTRS obligation) should begin; more immediately, the reserve cap should be removed and the transparency reporting provision reinserted. And going forward, these late-dropping, ground-shifting surprises have to be avoided.


John Affeldt is Managing Attorney at Public Advocates Inc., a nonprofit law firm and advocacy organization. He has been recognized by California Lawyer Magazine as a California Attorney of the Year.



Categories: LCFF, California State Budget (2014-15)

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply golden goose
12:10 AM on October 24, 2021 
I enjoy you because of all of the labor on this blog. My daughter enjoys conducting research and it is obvious why. A number of us learn all of the compelling manner you give useful tactics on the web blog and foster response from some other people about this concept and our child is always studying so much. Take pleasure in the remaining portion of the year. You are performing a fantastic job.
golden goose
Reply yeezy shoes
12:10 AM on October 24, 2021 
I precisely wanted to thank you very much once more. I do not know what I could possibly have created in the absence of those concepts revealed by you relating to such a area. It actually was an absolute depressing case in my opinion, but discovering a new specialised form you resolved it took me to cry over joy. I'm happier for your information and then hope that you find out what an amazing job you have been providing teaching the others using your blog post. I am certain you haven't got to know all of us.
yeezy shoes
Reply off white nike
12:09 AM on October 24, 2021 
I definitely wanted to construct a simple note to say thanks to you for these fantastic advice you are showing on this website. My long internet look up has finally been rewarded with pleasant ideas to go over with my relatives. I would repeat that many of us visitors are undoubtedly lucky to dwell in a superb network with very many wonderful individuals with interesting methods. I feel pretty blessed to have used the web pages and look forward to really more awesome moments reading here. Thank you once again for everything.
off white nike
Reply chrome hearts online store
12:08 AM on October 24, 2021 
My husband and i got really excited that Emmanuel could conclude his researching through the entire precious recommendations he acquired while using the weblog. It is now and again perplexing to just find yourself giving away tactics which usually the rest have been trying to sell. We fully grasp we need the blog owner to be grateful to for that. The type of illustrations you have made, the easy website menu, the relationships you will help to create - it's got everything powerful, and it's really making our son and us believe that this article is awesome, which is certainly quite indispensable. Thank you for all the pieces!
chrome hearts online store
Reply bape
12:08 AM on October 24, 2021 
I would like to show my appreciation for your kind-heartedness supporting all those that absolutely need guidance on this important topic. Your personal commitment to getting the message all through appeared to be really good and have always enabled men and women like me to achieve their endeavors. Your personal valuable help and advice means much a person like me and substantially more to my fellow workers. With thanks; from everyone of us.
Reply yeezy 700
12:07 AM on October 24, 2021 
I wish to express some appreciation to the writer just for bailing me out of this particular setting. Right after surfing around throughout the the net and getting notions which were not productive, I believed my life was done. Living without the presence of strategies to the difficulties you have fixed as a result of your article content is a critical case, as well as the ones that could have badly affected my entire career if I had not encountered your blog post. Your own expertise and kindness in playing with almost everything was precious. I don't know what I would have done if I hadn't come upon such a subject like this. It's possible to now relish my future. Thanks so much for this expert and amazing guide. I will not think twice to endorse your web blog to anybody who should have counselling on this situation.
yeezy 700
Reply goyard
12:06 AM on October 24, 2021 
I want to voice my affection for your kindness giving support to folks who really need help with in this study. Your special dedication to getting the message all-around was quite interesting and has frequently permitted folks just like me to get to their goals. This helpful suggestions denotes this much to me and much more to my fellow workers. Thanks a ton; from all of us.
Reply Koshushior
9:08 PM on October 23, 2021 
sildenafil generic price
Reply Boclileva
6:15 PM on October 23, 2021 
ivermectin side effects ivermectin stromectol tablet 3 mg stromectol tablets for humans
Reply Juliusguxf
5:20 AM on October 22, 2021 
viagra samples sildenafil 20 mg dosage discount viagra best generic viagra websites does generic sildenafil work
Reply AnArerymn
9:33 PM on October 20, 2021 
viagra timing discount viagra prices
Reply Shawnanisp
8:54 PM on October 18, 2021 
are there alternatives to viagra generic cialis us sildenafil 100 mg tablet cost sildenafil 50 mg levitra patient assistance application best website for viagra
Reply Glenntub
1:38 AM on October 18, 2021 
free prescriptions at kroger pharmacy best viagra generic natural herbal form of viagra what is in viagra herbal supplements for low libido in women cost of developing new drugs
Reply Loshushior
12:14 AM on October 18, 2021 
levitra twice daily cialis vs levitra vs viagra which one is better levitra vs viagra vardenafil generic
Reply supreme hoodie
4:15 PM on October 17, 2021 
I wish to show appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from this matter. After looking out throughout the world-wide-web and meeting proposals that were not pleasant, I believed my entire life was gone. Living without the solutions to the issues you have resolved all through your entire website is a serious case, as well as the kind that would have in a negative way damaged my entire career if I hadn't come across the blog. Your actual knowledge and kindness in touching everything was important. I don't know what I would have done if I hadn't come across such a step like this. I can also at this point look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this professional and result oriented guide. I will not be reluctant to endorse your blog post to anyone who ought to have guidance about this area.
supreme hoodie
Reply DnyuFrugs
2:50 AM on October 17, 2021 
caff?? al viagra viagra dejavu
Reply OscarTainy
7:44 PM on October 16, 2021 
sildenafil tab 20mg how does belviq work for weight loss buy viagra without perscription cialis black 800 mg reviews patient assistance program application
Reply orandet
4:23 AM on October 16, 2021 
ivermectin buy stromectol pills iwermektyna otc stromektol generik
Reply Quincytieli
10:41 AM on October 15, 2021 
men s sexual health supplements aviagra tadalafil research chemical how long does sildenafil last side effects of sildenafil 100mg supplement for cialis
Reply MichealCit
10:59 AM on October 14, 2021 
viagra new generic sildenafil for sale in usa evolution peptides tadalafil sildenafil pfizer 50 mg price grease pink ladies makeup predoxen reviews pictures